
Sharon Core, a 1998 Yale MFA grad, sprang into the art world’s consciousness with her 2004 show at Bellwether Gallery, “Thiebauds”. A photographic re-creation of the artist Wayne Thiebaud’s famous food paintings, Core reversed the conventional practice of paintings copying photographs by painstakingly baking, coloring, arranging, and lighting her re-creations and then printing them the same size as the Thiebaud originals.
Four years on and now showing at Yancey Richardson, Core has found new inspiration in the 19th century still life paintings of Raphaelle Peale. Unlike the Thiebauds, however, this time Core has not copied specific paintings. Instead she has analyzed Peale’s work in terms of subject matter, composition, coloration, lighting, and scale in order to understand exactly how they are made and then proceeded to create her own new works in an act of art historical homage.
It’s a difficult feat to pull off, but Core has succeeded where many others have failed, primarily by the softness of her lighting and her mastery of 19th century composition and perspective. As Core fully understands, if you’re going to go for it, you’ve got to go all the way.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Sharon Core
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Amelia's World

I first met Robin Schwartz in the mid-1990s after she had just published her first book– a collection of black and white photographs of monkeys living in domesticated surroundings. As well as being unusual and good photographs, the underlying theme of the work addressed the question of what degree of separation there was between man and animal and by extension the whole question of animal rights. I kept a box of her prints at my gallery and showed them whenever I had the chance, but in general they were not what people were looking for. You can see some examples here in the Primate Portraits section.
Now just over a decade later, Robin has had her third book published (by Aperture), a series of edenic color photographs of her daughter Amelia interacting with a range of animals. If Robin is the animal photographer, Amelia is the animal whisperer – a child who clearly has an unusual gift and connection with other species. As Robin told me, “Amelia is fearless. When she first met a kangaroo, she stuck her hands down her pouch to feel the joey! Nothing spooks her.”
The multi-level collaboration, between photographer, daughter, and animals have inspired Schwartz to broaden her style from a journalistic genre to a more contemporary art aesthetic. The photographs play with art and photo-historical references and I can easily see these pictures gracing the walls of collectors and museums. It’s an extraordinary pleasure to see someone whose work has always been good move on so effectively.
P.S.
After posting the above, Robin Schwartz sent me this picture taken just last week.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Political Science
Friday, October 24, 2008
Weekend Video - Sia
Here's an original photo driven video. "Breathe Me" by the Australian singer Sia from her album "Colour The Small One".
... and a bonus track - "Little Black Sandals".
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Big Shot

For much of his life, Andy Warhol was obsessed with photography. He bought it, borrowed it, and banged it out with regularity. Along with his many obsessions, he collected cameras, but there is no doubt that his favorite was the Polaroid Big Shot Camera which he used to photograph his commissioned portraits. (The photographs were then transferred to canvas where Warhol and/or his assistants would paint over and under the image.) While now out of production the camera is still readily available for about $20 - $30, in fact there are currently 8 for sale on Ebay. Warhol called the camera “his pencil and paper”.
While Warhol’s Big Shots portraits are justly famous, less known are the everyday photographs of objects he took between 1977 and 1983. Starting next week, however, the Paul Kasmin Gallery in Chelsea will be exhibiting 70 of these Polaroids for the first time. Still lives of bananas, knives, and crosses, and assemblages of shoes and other commercial products, the photographs are interesting not only for the objects Warhol chose to picture and the deadpan style with which he photographed them, but for the underlying themes of desire and mortality that run through the work and the prescient symbolism. Most significantly, though, the pictures show that it’s not the equipment that counts, but – as always - the ideas behind the work.
All works 1977 - 1983 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts. Courtesy of Paul Kasmin Gallery.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
And the Winner Is ...

A note about the process. Having promised a random selection, this is how the winner was chosen. At the end of the day, I printed out all the comments, weeded out duplicate entries, cut them up and put them in a large envelope, and asked the first person I ran into to pick one at random.
And the winner is … connally@camellia.com
Monday, October 20, 2008
Cute

Ixiana Hernandez is a New York based photographer with a sideline taking portraits of dogs. This is not a field rife with originality or substance, but I think Ixiana is the exception. On her website she says: “It is my goal to create portraits that do not rely on cuteness. I want to create portraits that reflect the dog’s character, and to show the viewer what I see when I look at them.” More than that, though, I think her use of color, lighting, and sharp detail, combined with what is clearly a strong and distinctive eye make them quite impressive as photographs in their own right. Cute but not too cute.
Equally (but differently) cute is Sadie Bay Weller, the daughter of private dealer Ariel Meyerowitz and David Weller, and the granddaughter of the great photographer Joel Meyerowitz. Soon to be two weeks old, young Sadie is set to be a much photographed child, but as these pictures by her grandfather (top picture) and mother (bottom) show, she's already a beauty and a ham!
And last, but not least, my blog-colleague Maegan recently posted these pictures of herself as Tinkerbelle. (Halloween, c. 1980.) I doubt it's possible to come up with a cuter picture from Halloween past but I'll challenge all readers nonetheless.
E-mail your entry to info@danzigerprojects.com. And a surprise Halloween gift to Maegan or whoever trumps these pictures.
P.S.
Print Giveaway #1 winner to be announced tomorrow!
Friday, October 17, 2008
Weekend Video - Les Miserables
Recommended for the weekend video by the legendary art director and graphic designer Ruth Ansel, this spoof of Les Miserables comes from the Ultimate Improv troupe of Los Angeles. (For new readers, click on Ruth Ansel's name for an inside look at her home/office.)
Thursday, October 16, 2008
More Random Shots

Perhaps the most newsworthy photographic announcement of the week was the acquisition of the Harry Shunk Archive by the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation. Shunk, who died in 2006 at 81, was known for photographing art by scores of modern and contemporary artists, including Rene Magritte, Yves Klein, Arman, Jean Tinguely, Christo, and Lichtenstein himself. But his most famous image, the photomontage "Le Saut Dans La Vide", a composite recreation of a purported event by Yves Klein, still stands as the defining moment of performance art. The archive, comprising thousands of prints and negatives, was purchased at a public estate auction conducted by the public administrator of New York. I believe this means it was picked up for a song.

I've always been a big fan as well as a student of NASA pictures, but I just happened to stumble across the above which I'd never seen before. Left on the moon by Charlie Duke of Apollo 16, according to NASA the picture was taken by Loudy Benjamin and contains a message on the back which reads "This is the family of Astronaut Duke from Planet Earth. Landed on the Moon, April 1972." Underneath the message are the signatures of his wife and kids. I believe history will record this as the first lunar print giveaway, the intended recipient being one photo loving extra-terrestrial!

From the site Ffffound, a poolside photograph which looks strangely like a photorealist painting.

From A Gallery for Fine Photography in New Orleans, a rare Elliott Erwitt taken in Brasilia in 1961.

This year's Nobel Prize in chemistry went to Osamu Shimomura, Martin Chalfie, and Roger Tsien for discovering and developing green fluorescent protein, or GFP, that has helped researchers watch the tiniest details of life within cells and living creatures. This image of fluoresced mouse brain cells illustrates their research but seems as much art as science.

And finally, for all those with cool camera envy, Olympus have just unveiled their forthcoming Micro Four Thirds concept camera. Little technical information is available as of now, but with its retro styling and small size the camera was the hit of last month's Photokina.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Print Giveaway #1

The photograph above is an 8x10 inch print of Audrey Hepburn c. 1960 taken by Cecil Beaton. It is the first in what will become a regular series of print giveaways! Some will be photographs from my collection, some will be prints donated by famous photographers, etc.. My only criteria for now is that the print will have to fit into a Fed Ex envelope.
The rules are simple. Just post a comment that includes a way to contact you. The winner will be chosen after one week by randomly picking one of the comments posted.
Good luck!
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Camera Notes

Earlier this year, an Italian photographer and camera buff named Michele Ferrario found a double pack of Kodak instant film with an expiry date of 1991. Not many people are aware of this, but Kodak once made an instant camera, the EK100, in an attempt to compete with Polaroid. They quickly faced numerous legal challenges and after nine years in court Kodak lost and was left with millions of unsellable cameras and packs of film – some of which apparently are still floating around. After an extensive search Ferrario found a working camera and tried it out. The pictures (above and below) are like a cross between spirit pictures and an experiment in time travel moving backwards and forward between past and present. And for anyone interested, there’s a camera for sale on Ebay. At the time of this writing, it’s at $10 Australian dollars!
Monday, October 13, 2008
Random Shots from All Over
Over the long weekend, I took the opportunity to surf the web in search of interesting images. Here are some of my finds:
From Yann Arthus-Bertrand, the master of aerial photography, a road in Egypt's Nile Valley covered by sand dunes.
From Fahey-Klein Gallery in Los Angeles, this Patrick Demachelier photograph of Gisele Bundchen. Fahey-Klein's show opens in conjunction with the photographer's retrospective at the Petit Palais in Paris.
From the forthcoming show of political photographs by Diana Walker at Howard Greenberg, this shot of Republicans enjoying themselves.
Answering the question of whatever happened to the three little piggies, this image taken during the summer floods in Iowa.
Scientists have created a beautification algorithm through which you can run a picture to make any face conform to idealized notions of beauty. Brigitte Bardot and James Franco came out unchanged.
Meanwhile, Esquire Magazine reprise their famous Platon "crotch shot" of Bill Clinton with a more graceful Cliff Watts portrait of their "sexiest woman alive", Halle Berry.
From the blog I Heart Photograh an introduction to the work of Manuel Vazquez.
And an echo from TIME's "Pictures of the Week" in this photograph of visiting parents of new students at a Chinese university allowed to sleep overnight in the gym.
Not surprisingly there's now a website devoted to pictures of sad looking traders. Click here.
Brad Pitt publishes his home pictures of wife Angelina Jolie in W Magazine. A mini-controversy erupts over the apparent breast-feeding pictured on the cover, but there's a much better and more striking picture of those famous lips inside.
And last but not least, when it come to super-cute, this picture was hard to beat!
Friday, October 10, 2008
Weekend Video - Emily Haines
Emily Haines is a big name in the Canadian indie music scene, known for her dark but infectious piano-driven songs. Her debut release, “Knives Don't Have Your Back” was critically lauded as one of the best albums of 2006, and the video for the single “Our Hell”, directed by Jaron Albertin, is one of the most original visuals I’ve seen recently. I believe the eerie effect comes from the use of heat sensitive film, but correct me if I’m wrong.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Alejandra Laviada

I’m in the process of laying out our next show for an opening this Saturday to which you’re all invited. The artist is Alejandra Laviada, a 28 year old Mexican photographer whose work consists of going into old buildings in Mexico City that are about to be demolished, creating sculptures out of the detritus she finds, and then making a photograph of what she’s created. Her pictures burst with inventiveness, and her prints are large, colorful, and luminous. They remind me of a cross between the work of Tara Donovan (who was just awarded a MacArthur “Genius” grant) and the still lives of Irving Penn. (While of course remaining totally original.)
People are always interested in how someone gets a show so here’s
how it happened. I first saw Alejandra’s work in 2007 as part of PEEK – the follow up to Art & Commerce’s first Festival of Emerging Photo-
graphers. It stood out for me there and I made a mental note of the work. This past February Jorg Colberg gave her the briefest mention but it reminded me of her name. Then this spring Laviada’s new work was not only included in Kathy Ryan’s standout exhibition, “Chisel” at the first New York Photo Festival, but was a complete knockout for me. It had not only gone where I hoped her work would go, but had surpassed it. So I tracked her down and held my breath hoping that I would be able to convince her to do a show at Danziger Projects. Fortunately she was game and the only unusual thing was that we were able to schedule something so quickly.
Here’s what I wrote for our press release:
For Alejandra Laviada, Mexico City is more than her birthplace and home. The abandoned buildings and transitional aura of the sprawling capital city also serve as the inspiration and starting point of her original and inventive constructed still life photographs.
These photographs – exquisitely crafted large color prints - consist of elegant sculptural installations created on site from the everyday objects that Laviada finds in old and dilapidated buildings in Mexico City. The objects are mundane – dried out paint cans, old wheels, brooms, broken chairs, letters from old signage – but in Laviada's hands each construction is both an elegant exercise in creating a three dimensional work and a two dimensional record of pieces of history that are about to vanish while a new history is created. In Laviada's own words her work "explores the shifting relationship between photography and sculpture, whereby ordinary objects are stripped of their traditional function and perceived differently". On numerous levels, the works are about a reconciliation of past and future, classicism and modernism.
Alejandra Laviada was born in Mexico City in 1980. She began her artistic career as a painter, graduating from the Rhode Island School of Design in 2003. Soon after, however, she turned her attention to photography, completing an MFA in photography at the School of Visual Arts in New York. Upon graduating, she was selected as one of 11 artists to featured in PEEK – the 2007 installment of The Art + Commerce Festival of Emerging Photographers.
Since her work first appeared in PEEK, Laviada has been commissioned and published in magazines including the New York Times Magazine, American Photo, and VOGUE. She was awarded honorable mention at the XII Photography Biennial in Mexico, and her work was singled out by critics when it was most recently shown as part of the exhibit "Chisel" at the first New York Photo Festival.
This will be Alejandra Laviada's first solo American show.
Anyway, please check it out for yourself. The opening is from 6 to 8 p.m. on Saturday, October 11. 521 West 26th Street between 10th and 11th.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Michael Phelps Revisited

I've always considered sports photography to be an under-appreciated genre of photography. Photojournalism, dance photography, jazz photography, fashion photography, are all seen on a higher level, so perhaps it's an accessibility thing. I prefer to make quality and originality the criteria.
As an example of this, I just came across this remarkable sequence of pictures showing unequivocally how Michael Phelps won the 100 meter butterfly by 1/100 of a second. The photographs were "taken" by Heinz Kleutmeier and Jeff Kavanaugh - Kleutmeier being one of the top Sports Illustrated photographers and Jeff Kavanaugh his assistant. As Vincent Laforet points out on his blog it's a rare event for photographers to share credit, but in this case the pictures were the result of so much collaborative planning, remote shuttering, computer synching etc., that the credit was both generous and appropriate.
The first picture (above) is a reminder of the trouble Phelps was in in this particular race. After 50 meters he was 7th of 8.

Phelps made a critical decision in the final meters to attempt another half-stroke while Serbia's Milorad Cavic (right) tried to glide to the finish.

With less than a meter to go, Phelps still trailed Cavic and his only hope was to somehow out-touch the Serbian.

Cavic was inches from stopping Phelps' quest for eight gold medals as the American reached over the water for his final half-stroke.

Phelps brought his hands down through the water and touched the wall .01 seconds before Cavic finished his glide to the wall, swiping the gold medal and tying Mark Spitz's record of seven golds at one Olympics.

As seen in this blowup from the previous frame, Cavic hadn't touched the wall yet.

The Serbian delegation filed a protest, but conceded that Phelps won after reviewing the tape provided by FINA, swimming's governing body.

Seven frames from one of the greatest seconds in sport and in sports photography.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Covered and Uncovered
Catalog time is always fun. Having been in the business a long time and knowing all the players, it’s interesting to see what each house puts on the cover and what the subtext is. I'll get to the above cover shortly.
Christies have recently tended to go with sexy, fashion-y images and now own that sector, but they have taken a serious turn this season with a Vik Muniz (estimated at $30,000 - $50,000) on their Contemporary Photographs sale cover, and a Harry Callahan experimental Chicago image on the cover of the general photographs sale. (Estimate $25,000 - $35,000.) Having won the fashionista battle but lost out on some heavyweight collections it’s a signal that they’re back to fight on the classics.
Phillips, still a relative newcomer, weigh in with a silver-toned reproduction (bearing no relation to the original) of Helmut Newton’s table-top portrait of Charlotte Rampling. The message - “Look at us! We’re edgy, we’re glossy, we’re sexy (but also expensive)." (Estimate - $120,000 - $180,000.)
Bloomsbury, a genuine newcomer holding their first sale in New York, have to my mind the best cover with this striking central detail from a larger picture by Ruud Van Empel. (Estimate $35,000 - $45,000.)
Now back to the top photograph. Sotheby’s go from staid to sensationalistic with the Edward Weston of Tina Modotti (estimated at $250,000 - $300,000). I’m pretty sure it’s the first time anyone has put a full frontal nude on the cover of their catalog so it’s a bold message signifying that they can do it all!
Investment wise, however, if I had to put my money on a single artist, Edward Weston would be my guy. At sub million dollar prices – which his very best works are still available for – I firmly predict this would be one of the safest places to park your money while waiting for the banking crisis or indeed the U.S. economy to recover. You betcha!
“Tina on the Azotea” was made in 1924 on the terrace of the house Weston and Tina Modotti shared just outside of Mexico City. Sotheby’s catalog information helpfully fills in the story behind the photograph:
Weston may have encountered the charismatic, talented, and politically outspoken Tina Modotti as early as 1919 or 1920 in California. Both were married at the time of their meeting: Weston to the former Flora Chandler, the mother of his four sons, and Modotti to the poet Robaix de L'Abrie Richey. Weston and Modotti's affair was already established by July 1923 when the couple sailed, along with Weston's eldest son Chandler, to Mexico. They settled into a small house on the outskirts of Mexico City, and it was there that Modotti took up her complex role as Weston's lover, muse, apprentice, and guide to the vibrant ancient and modern cultures of Mexico.
Mexico stimulated a change in Weston's work. Whether it was the clarity of the Mexican light, or his contacts with a new and exciting group of Mexican and expatriate artists, Weston's photographs soon became characterized by a greater amount of detail and an almost obsessive attention to the object in front of his camera. This change in vision necessitated a change in his technical approach to photographing, and in June of 1924 he purchased a lens that could stop down to a narrow aperture, allowing him to capture his subjects in sharper detail. In his Daybook he wrote, 'For 25 pesos I purchased a Rapid-Rectilinear lens in a cheaply made shutter. Now I start a new phase of my photographic career with practically the same objective that I began with some twenty years ago. My expensive anastigmatic and my several diffused lenses [standard tools for the Pictorialist photographer] seem destined to contemptuous neglect, though it may be that I shall dust them off for an occasional portrait head. The shutter stops down to 256; this should satisfy my craving for more depth of focus.'
Thus equipped, Weston attempted to take studies of clouds the following month from the roof of his house. When the rapid movement of the clouds through the sky made it difficult to capture them photographically, Weston found new subject matter close by, producing the group of photographs from which Tina on the Azotea almost certainly comes. He wrote, 'My eyes and thoughts were heavenward indeed—until, glancing down, I saw Tina lying naked on the azotea taking a sun-bath. My cloud "sitting" was ended, my camera turned down to a more earthly theme, and a series of interesting negatives was obtained. Having just examined them again I am enthusiastic and feel that this is the best series of nudes I have done of Tina.'
In Modotti, Weston found someone who broadened his horizons, as Margrethe Mather had done for him in the previous decade. Through Modotti, Weston was introduced to a world of people and ideas he would not otherwise have known. Modotti—whose own mastery of the photographic medium is unequivocal —posed for Weston throughout the duration of their relationship. Weston's early portraits and nude studies of Modotti were done in his individualistic early 1920s style, a style which had progressed past the standard vocabulary of Pictorialism but had not yet entered fully into Modernism. 'Head of an Italian Girl' and 'The White Iris', to name just two pictures from early in Weston's and Modotti's relationship, possess a lush, sensual, and romantic beauty. The study offered here, no less beautiful and made only a few years later, incorporates a radically different photographic approach. Taken outside the controlled confines of the photographer's studio, and incorporating the disarray of the blanket on which Modotti rests and the roughness of the terrace, the photograph places Modotti's beauty firmly within the corporeal world.
A series of nude studies that Weston would begin a year later—of Anita Brenner and Miriam Lerner—would take the photographer further into the realm of objective Modernism. Now icons, these studies would lead, in turn, to his tour-de-force studies of shells and peppers. But the frank sensuality embodied in Tina on the Azotea would never be as fully realized in Weston's later work as it is in this photograph.
An interesting sidebar to the above. I was recently looking at Kim Weston’s website (Edward’s grandson) where in addition to his own photographs you can find his father Cole Weston’s posthumous prints of Edward’s photographs. Observant readers of this blog may remember that I’ve always been a particular fan of Edward’s “nude in the dune” series from 1936 and there was an image (below) I had never seen before. Does it remind you of anything?
Friday, October 3, 2008
Weekend Video - Janis Joplin
YouTube never ceases to amaze me. One of my favorite Janis Joplin songs is her relatively obscure version of Rodgers and Hart’s “Little Girl Blue”. Joplin recorded the song in 1969 after the success of the track “Summertime” on the album Cheap Thrills, so the idea was to mix another re-worked show tune into her follow-up album Pearl. However, Joplin died in 1970 and the song was added to the album posthumously as a live version.
I never thought I would actually get to see film of Joplin singing the song, but a YouTube search offered up this 1969 clip taken from the singer Tom Jones’s variety show – “This is Tom Jones”. Amazing....
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Sheila Metzner
Sheila Metzner installation at The Visual Arts Museum
Three more days to catch the retrospective of Sheila Metzner’s work at the Visual Arts Museum at The School of Visual Arts.
Metzner, who began photographing in the mid-1970s, has always been resolutely her own person whether her work was in fashion or not, and thirty years on her work seems even more distinctive and personal than ever. Working not so much in the Victorian style of photography but in the Victorian, Japonais inflections of Whistler and Sargent, Metzner has mastered most every genre of photography – portraits, floral abstraction, travel, the nude, fashion, urban landscapes, still life, and family pictures – to name a few.
The show contains approximately 100 prints hung salon style and all made by the Fresson printing process - a rare method of color printing that renders characteristically diffused images with remarkable tonal range and color saturation. The process uses layered oil pigments in gelatin and requires between four to seven separate negatives, yielding luminous, glowing colors and a softened, painterly effect. With its chemistry a tightly held secret and production highly limited, Metzner is one of the few photographers in the world who has consistently used the process throughout her career.
Of particular note are the photographs from one of Metzner’s latest series “36 Views of Brooklyn Bridge”, a response to the famous woodblock prints “36 Views of Mount Fuji” by the Japanese artist Katsushika Hokusai. Shot in both black and white and color and from numerous vantage points, the bridge dissolves and coalesces before our eyes – as Metzner explores the infinite photographic possibilities.
The one sad note in the show is that it quietly incorporates the photographer’s own memorial to her late husband, Jeffrey, a talented artist, teacher, and art director who died unexpectedly earlier this year. Metzner’s many portraits of her husband taken throughout her photographic career comprise their own loving “Views of a Modern Man” as Jeffrey – always the prototypical New Yorker – subjects himself to his wife’s inspection. His good nature and Sheila Metzner’s complete lack of cynicism are the twin spirits of this unusual and wonderful show.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
William Eggleston

Following yesterday’s reference to William Eggleston, a short report on the forthcoming sale of Eggleston works at Christies, New York. The back story is a true Hollywood tale – a notable film company executive and his wife start collecting photographs in a big way, they hire a young woman to help catalog their rapidly acquired collection, the husband starts an extra-curatorial relationship with the cataloger, and before you know it the marriage is over and the collection is on the auction block. It’s not the way an artist likes to see his work come on the market, but that's life in the fast lane.
The photographs coming up for sale present a wide cross section of Eggleston’s work – some of his best pieces and some less so. The sale lacks his most famous single work, the seminal “Red Ceiling”, but it has images from most of Eggleston’s important series and includes a full set of the Los Alamos portfolios – 75 dye transfer prints taken from 1965 to 1974 encompassing all of the artists major concerns and themes. (The set is estimated at a lowball figure of $350,000 - $550,000 but is probably worth more in the $1 million range.)
Eggleston’s story is equally colorful (no pun intended). Born in Memphis, Tennessee, and raised in Sumner, Mississippi, Eggleston was an introverted and artistic child who took up photography when a friend gave him a Leica camera. Originally influenced by the work of Cartier-Bresson and Robert Frank, Eggleston began experimenting with color as early as 1965 and seems to have developed his trademark aesthetic pretty much on his own. A renowned boozer, womanizer, and charmer, his earliest patrons were MoMA’s John Szarkowski and the Corcoran’s Walter Hopps and their patronage led to a teaching job at Harvard in the mid 70s.
It was at this time that he discovered dye-transfer printing. As legend has it, he was examining the price list of a photographic lab and as he later recalled: "It advertised 'from the cheapest to the ultimate print.' The ultimate print was a dye-transfer. I went straight up there to look and everything I saw was commercial work like pictures of cigarette packs or perfume bottles but the color saturation and the quality of the ink was overwhelming. I couldn't wait to see what a picture would look like with the same process. Every photograph I subsequently printed with the process seemed fantastic and each one seemed better than the previous one."
At Harvard, Eggleston prepared his first portfolio, entitled 14 Pictures (1974), which consisted of fourteen dye-transfer prints. Two years later Eggleston's became the first color photographer to have a one-person show at MOMA – an exhibition now regarded as a watershed moment in the history of photography, but which at the time sharply divided critics and photography fans alike. (Szarkowski referred to Eggleston's pictures as "perfect," to which the highly offended New York Times art critic Hilton Kramer responded, "Perfect? Perfectly banal, perhaps. Perfectly boring, certainly.")
From then on, however, Eggleston’s radically modern vision, his embrace of everyday Americana, his exploration of color, and his belief in the profundity of the ordinary, along with his cool and louche Southern lifestyle and introspective personality combined to make him an icon of cool and the dominant influence on contemporary American photography.
In November, The Whitney will mount their own major retrospective of Eggleston’s work and we will get a chance to see a more considered view of his career. In the meantime, here are a few of my favorite images from a collection whose story would surely have given the artist a good laugh in his best bar-hopping moments.
Untitled, 1972, from "10.D.70.V2"
Untitled, 1973, from "Dust Bells, Volume II"
Untitled, 1965 1968, from "Dust Bells, Volume II"































































